Showing posts with label happens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label happens. Show all posts

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

Affordable Care Act: Cancellations ExplainedWhy Insurers Cancel Policies, And What You Can Do When It HappensWebMD News from Kaiser Health News

By Julie Appleby

Wed, Oct 30 2013

News that health insurers are ending the policies of what could be millions of Americans has rattled consumers and added to the debate over the health care law.

If you or a family member has been notified that your individual policy is being cancelled at year’s end, you may be stunned and upset.

House Republicans sparred with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Wednesday over the cancellations, with Sebelius saying the law generally didn’t require insurers to discontinue plans if they were in effect at the time of the law’s enactment in March 2010.

No one knows how many of the estimated 14 million people who buy their own insurance are getting such notices, but the numbers are substantial. Some insurers report discontinuing 20 percent of their individual business, while other insurers have notified up to 80 percent of policyholders that they will have to change plans.

Here is a guide to help you understand the bigger picture, including why your premiums and benefits are likely to change next year and what you should consider as you shop for a new policy.

Q. Why is this happening?

A. The so-called individual market was targeted by the health care law because it didn’t work well for many people who do not get coverage through an employer, particularly those who were older or had health problems. The latter were often rejected for coverage, charged more or had their conditions excluded from coverage.  Some policies were so skimpy they provided only the barest of coverage when someone did fall ill.

Starting Jan. 1, insurers can no longer reject people who are sick or charge them more than the healthy under the Affordable Care Act. They must also beef up policies to meet minimum standards and add benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, maternity care and mental health services.

Q. Why am I getting this notice?

A. Most likely your plan didn’t meet all the standards of the federal health law.  One type of policy being discontinued by Florida Blue, for example, did not cover hospitalizations or emergency room visits and paid a maximum of $50 toward doctor visits.  It’s possible your plan also had deductibles and other potential expenses - such as copayments for doctors and hospital care -- that exceeded the law’s annual out-of-pocket maximum of $6,350 for individuals or $12,700 for families. Insurers may have just decided to end certain types of policies, something they have always had the ability to do. Some policies that fail to meet the law’s standards can still be sold, but only if the insurer decides to continue them and they are “grandfathered,” meaning you purchased one before March 2010 and neither you nor the insurer has made any substantial change since then.  Adjusting an annual deductible, which many people do each year to keep down their premiums, is a change that could end grandfathered status.

// init webmdArticle pluginrequirejs(['article/1/article'],function(){$('#dyn-art').webmdArticle({pageData: {title: "Affordable Care Act: Cancellations Explained", imgPath: "", caption: "", description: "Why Insurers Cancel Policies, And What You Can Do When It Happens", type: "article"}, shareTypes:{email: {htmlTemplate: 'Email'}}, shareText: '', expandIcons: {html: {more: 'More', less: 'Less'}, position: 3}});});hospital waiting area

See expert answers to questions about health reform.

Couple working on bills

A guide to what's changing under the new law.


View the original article here

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Besides this Monday Metro column, I write my Class Struggle column every Thursday for the Local Living section. It focuses on parents. When I move to California next year, I hope to rename it "The School Parent" and compare the adventures of families here to parent-school encounters elsewhere. Such stories are full of surprises.

For instance, a McLean High School father complained to me recently about teachers not letting his children take their graded exams home so they could get a better sense of their errors. It was an anti-cheating measure that seemed to frustrate learning. Assuming it was an isolated phenomenon, I did a Local Living column about it.

Wrong again. The online version of the column about it got 68 comments, three times as many as I usually get. E-mails poured in. Hiding exams was more common than I realized. A frustrated tutor in California said that "it's not only absurd, but unethical, for a teacher to withhold the results of tests when they are a major component of the grade."

Phyllis Payne, a Fairfax County parent, said one teacher told her that "she uses the same tests every year, so she can't let the children keep the test questions. As a former teacher, I'm mystified by this approach." A top student at West Potomac High School in Fairfax County was ignored when she asked to see a test to determine why she got a D.

Teachers said parents and students missed the point. Anne Cullen, who teaches honors-level journalism at Montgomery Blair High School in Montgomery County, said that "creating a quality test (e.g. one without ambiguous or misleading answers) takes considerable time and effort, and so it is simply not reasonable to expect teachers to design new sets of tests for each unit taught." Teachers usually let students review their results in class, but parents and students say that isn't enough time.

The exchanges on my blog got ugly. Parents accused teachers of being lazy. Teachers said parents were enabling cheaters who would share old tests, maybe for a fee.

Some readers asked me to check with test preparation experts, or psychometricians, before I waded into this swamp. I have talked to them for decades. They patiently explain the long hours and many dollars needed to create tests that are fair to all students and align with learning standards they must assess.

One problem is that many local school districts are going to great lengths to standardize their own tests - making sure, for instance, that all U.S. history classes have the same final - to prepare their students for the standardized state tests used to judge schools under federal and state laws. Having done all that work, they want to reuse at least some questions, so they can't send them home. But do we really need such well-polished exams at every level?

The SAT and ACT college entrance tests, the AP, IB and Cambridge college-level tests, and the state achievement tests are worth the time and expense. They don't need to be returned to students (although in some cases they can be, for a fee). Why can't school districts let teachers write their own tests and let kids go home with them, as happened when their parents were in school?

Districts say they standardize their tests to protect students from unsettling differences between, say, the way Ms. Gonzalez in Room 313 and the way Mr. Wu in Room 315 grade their junior English students. I don't see the need. Students have survived erratic grading for several decades without much harm. It helps prepare them for dating.

Making every test so gold-plated it can't be taken home to learn from mistakes does hurt the learning process, and needlessly frustrates parents. Some college professors used to hand out many possible exam questions and say that only two or three would be used. That produced careful study, and some learning. Isn't that the point of tests?


View the original article here